Wall v. AT & T TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
District Court, M.D. North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ERWIN, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the court upon defendant AT & T’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The parties have fully briefed their positions, and the matter is now ready for a ruling. The court grants defendant’s summary judgment motion with respect to the following issues: (1) the plaintiff’s racial discrimination claims under both Title VII and Section 1981; (2) the plaintiff’s racial harassment claims under both Title VII and Section 1981; and (3) plaintiff’s sexual harassment claim under Section 1981.…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Little v. SmithDistrict Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2000
- Thomas v. Shoney's Inc.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1994
- Ernest Dillon v. Anthony M. Frank, Postmaster GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- Morris v. Boston Edison Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1996
- Bell v. E. Davis International, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.