Legal Opinion

Donovan v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 30, 2002No. 1310-00PublishedCited by 108 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · KellerKeller, P.J.

MEYERS, KEASLER, HERVEY, and COCHRAN, JJ., joined.

In accordance with a plea agreement, appellant was placed on deferred adjudication. He subsequently filed a motion for new trial, claiming that his plea was involuntary because he was unaware of (and his attorney failed to inform him of) the numerous conditions of probation that could be assessed. Denying the motion for new trial without a hearing, the trial court held that it did not have the authority to hear or grant a motion for new trial. Relying upon Rule 21 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure1 and Article 42.12 of the Texas…

3Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Boykin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
  2. Manuel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
  3. Cooper v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
  4. Issa v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  5. Jordan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by108 opinions

  1. Taylor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
  2. Beedy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
  3. Lopez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
  4. Labib v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
  5. Hurley v. State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2004

103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API