Legal Opinion

Barclaysamerican/Financial, Inc. v. Boone

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 22, 1989No. 16-88-01460; CA A49530PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Plaintiff moved for a summary judgment in this action on a promissory note executed by defendants. Defendants did not deny they were in default, but contended that plaintiff had elected the remedy of non-judicial foreclosure of a trust deed securing the note before filing its complaint. The trial court granted plaintiffs motion. Defendants appeal, and we affirm.

Defendants argue that, once a non-judicial foreclosure of a trust deed is commenced pursuant to ORS 86.735 et seq, there is a statutory prohibition against abandonment in favor of an action on the note because of the doctrine of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Family Bank of Commerce v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  2. Siuslaw Valley Bank, Inc. v. Christopher H. Canfield Associates, Oreg., Ltd.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kerr v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  2. Barclaysamerican/Financial, Inc. v. BooneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API