Legal Opinion

Oberling v. Miller

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 20, 1956No. 4192PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELLIS, Judge.

Plaintiff, the owner of certain timber lands, entered into a contract with the defendant covering the sale of all the pine timber upon plaintiff’s lands 12 inches in diameter and up, 12 inches from the ground, and all hardwood 10 inches in diameter at 16 inches. Cedar and Pecan trees on the property were specifically excluded, and there was a further provision these were not to be cut or destroyed in any manner. Another provision bound the defendant to repair any fences that were destroyed or damaged in removing the timber. The contract was dated October 6, 1951 and the defendant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Transportation Equipment Co. v. Younger Bros.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1948
  2. Reymond v. SumrallLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1953
  3. Levin's Auction Exchange v. SamuelsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1946

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stephen J. Kozan v. Dr. Glenn E. ComstockCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  2. Hunter v. MayfieldLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. Ridge Oak Development, Inc. v. MurphyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1994
  4. Stephen J. Kozan v. Dr. Glenn E. ComstockCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API