Legal Opinion
Reymond v. Sumrall
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided November 13, 1953No. 3741PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAVANAUGH, Judge.
The plaintiffs sued the defendants individually and in solido for the value of timber cut and removed from 45 acres of land situated in the Parish of East Baton Rouge described in their petition. The suit is a tort action and plaintiff claims a value of $40 each for ten of the trees containing 3,666 feet of timber, on account of their special and unusual value and beauty, and $30 for thirty-four of the trees containing approximately 15,404 feet of timber. Plaintiffs allege that they did not receive positive knowledge of the trespass until February 28, 1951. Suit was filed on…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- National Park Bank v. Concordia Land & Timber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
- Young v. International Paper Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
- Ducros v. St. Bernard Cypress Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
- Spyker v. International Paper Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
- Poirier v. Burton-Swartz Cypress Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ridge Oak Development, Inc. v. MurphyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1994
- American Insurance Co. v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
- James W. Beasley v. Fairchild Hiller CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Vial v. South Central Bell TelephoneLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
- Pachi v. KammerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.