Legal Opinion

Andrews v. Wingard

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 18, 2017No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 14-5538PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

Rufe, District judge

Before the Court are Petitioner Earl Andrews’s pro se objections to the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) filed by Magistrate Judge Henry S. Perkin. For the reasons that follow, the Court will overrule the objections and deny the Petition for a writ of habeas corpus.

I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Petitioner is incarcerated in a state correctional institution, having pleaded guilty to three counts of robbery and one count of unauthorized use of an automobile in the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas.1 The trial court originally sentenced Petitioner…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. MILES V. SORBERDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
  2. WESLING v. TICEDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API