Andrews v. Wingard
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
Rufe, District judge
Before the Court are Petitioner Earl Andrews’s pro se objections to the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) filed by Magistrate Judge Henry S. Perkin. For the reasons that follow, the Court will overrule the objections and deny the Petition for a writ of habeas corpus.
I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Petitioner is incarcerated in a state correctional institution, having pleaded guilty to three counts of robbery and one count of unauthorized use of an automobile in the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas.1 The trial court originally sentenced Petitioner…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- MILES V. SORBERDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
- WESLING v. TICEDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2020