Matter of Wilson v. . Dorflinger Sons
New York Court of Appeals
Motion to amend remittitur. (See 218 N. Y. 84.)
1Per curiam
The decision handed down in this case on April 25, 1916, read as follows: “ Order reversed, with costs, and claim dismissed.” Doubt having arisen as to the parties against whom the court intended to award costs by this decision, the attorney-general has moved to amend the remittitur so as to provide for costs against the claimant only. Counsel for the .appellants agrees that the remittitur should be amended by inserting therein the name of the party against whom costs are awarded, but contends that the costs should be awarded against the state industrial commission rather than against the…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Royal's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Boe v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1941
- Claim of Sheridan v. P. J. Groll Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1916
- In Re the Claim of PetrieNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Matter of Chappelle v. . Four Hundred and Twelve BroadwayNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.