Legal Opinion

Boe v. State

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1941No. File No. 6752PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Burr, Ch. J.

Plaintiffs applied to the workmen’s compensation bureau for compensation. The application was denied, and plaintiffs appealed to the district court. The court affirmed the decision of the bureau, and dismissed the proceeding, with costs to the bureau in the sum of $13. Plaintiffs moved to vacate the judgment for costs, insisting that costs could not be taxed against the plaintiffs, even though unsuccessful, and, further, that such claimants were entitled under the statute to reasonable attorneys’ fees without reference to the outcome of the proceeding.

The court amended the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Swallow v. First State BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Matter of Wilson v. . Dorflinger SonsNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  3. Wallace v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Casseday ex rel. Kinslow v. RobertsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Wallace v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1939

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Feist v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Bateman v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Bateman v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API