Legal Opinion

Dunlap v. Stichting Mayflower Mountain Fonds

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided August 7, 2003No. 20010724-CAPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GREENWOOD, Judge.

{1 This case comes before the court on appeal from a grant of summary judgment for Plaintiffs, Robert W. Dunlap, Kathy L. Dunlap, and United Park City Mines Company (collectively, the Dunlaps). Defendants, Stichting Mayflower Mountain Fonds and Mayflower Recreational Fonds (collectively, Mayflower), appeal the trial court's grant of summary judgment quieting title to a patented mining claim (the Marsac Lode) 1 in Summit County, Utah, in the Dunlaps. We reverse.

BACKGROUND

I. Chain of Title to the Marsac Lode

T2 Both parties assert ownership of the Marsac Lode through…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Blue Cross and Blue Shield v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  2. U.P.C., Inc. v. R.O.A. General, Inc.Court of Appeals of Utah · 1999
  3. Bearden v. CroftUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Salt Lake City v. Silver Fork Pipeline Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Gregerson v. JensenUtah Supreme Court · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2011
  2. Dunlap v. Stichting Mayflower Mountain FondsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API