Legal Opinion

Susquehanna Silk Mills v. Rebora

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 21, 1933PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMerrell, J.

The present action is brought by a number of insurance companies who joined as nominal parties plaintiff their respective assureds. Plaintiffs, in the complaint, attempt to set forth facts which plaintiffs claim entitled them to equitable relief and for a judicial accounting by defendants of their acts as general average adjusters under an agreement entered into between the appellants’ assureds as consignees of certain merchandise dehvered to them by the defendant Navigazione Generale Italiana. The defendants in this action are Emilio Rebora and Eho Tarabotto, as general average adjusters for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Marble Co. v. RipleySupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. Karrick v. HannamanSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  3. Rebora v. British & Foreign Marine InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  4. Rebora v. BritishAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
  5. Susquehanna Silk Mills v. ReboraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Levine v. Advest, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  2. In re Allcity InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  3. People v. FinnCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API