Legal Opinion

Hill v. Kokosky

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 19, 1990No. Docket 118393PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMackenzie, J.

This is a medical malpractice action. Plaintiffs appeal as of right from an order granting summary disposition in favor of defendant doctors Mary Kokosky and Moustafa Hassan pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(10). The Michigan State Medical Society has filed an amicus brief aligned with defendants’ position. We affirm.

The basic issue in this case is whether a doctor who is contacted by a patient’s treating physician to discuss treatment alternatives owes a duty of care to the patient whose case is discussed.

On January 3, 1986, Kelly Burston, approximately twenty-two weeks pregnant, was admitted to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Moning v. AlfonoMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Duvall v. GoldinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Rogers v. HorvathMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Ingber v. KandlerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  5. Green Construction Co. v. Williams Form Engineering Corp.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1980

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Bryant v. Oakpointe Villa Nursing Centre, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Lection v. Dyll, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2001
  3. Lopez v. Aziz, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1993
  4. Irvin Ex Rel. Irvin v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  5. McKinney v. SchlatterOhio Court of Appeals · 1997

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API