Legal Opinion

United States v. Roemig

District Court, N.D. Iowa

Decided November 23, 1943No. 2085PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DELEHANT, District Judge.

The defendant, as his initial action, and before plea, in this case, has filed a motion to quash the indictment found and returned against him for the alleged criminal destruction by fire of war materials and war premises, upon the asserted ground that the grand jury returning the indictment was not legally constituted. The specification of invalidity is the alleged systematic, intentional and deliberate exclusion of women from the membership of the grand jury. It is made satisfactorily to appear that the defendant was not, prior to, or at the time of, the selection,…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Strauder v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Ex Parte VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  4. Smith v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Norris v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Ballard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. State v. . EmerySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  3. United States v. GreenbergDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
  4. State v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Young v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API