Lauter v. Hirsch
New York Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the City Court of the city of ' Kew York denying a motion to vacate an order appointing a receiver in supplementary proceedings.
1Per curiam
It is conceded th-at there is no property-which would justify the appointment of the receiver except *166an interest under the will of the appellant’s deceased father, who died February 3, 1909, leaving a widow who- is still living, and six children. The residuary estate is left to the executors in trust for the widow during her life. The will then proceeds as follows: “ and upon her death, I direct that my said entire estate, or as much thereof as shall remain, be divided among all my children in equal shares, and should any of my children die, leaving issue surviving, such issue shall take the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Moore v. LittelNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
- In Re the Accounting of CraneNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Connelly v. . O'BrienNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- In re the Judicial Accounting of KeoghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
- In re the Judicial Accounting of KeoghNew York Surrogate's Court · 1905
3Cited by1 opinion
- Security Trust Co. v. BradleyNew York Supreme Court · 1942