Legal Opinion

Stutts v. Swaim

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 15, 1976No. 7519SC784PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, Judge.

The validity of the comprehensive zoning ordinance adopted by defendant city on 9 May 1967 is not challenged by any party to this action. Two major questions are raised by the pleadings: (1) the validity of the 12 November 1968 rezoning ordinance, and (2) laches on the part of plaintiffs. We will discuss the questions in that order.

The burden was on plaintiffs to show that the 12 November 1968 rezoning ordinance was invalid. State v. Joyner, 286 N.C. 366, 211 S.E. 2d 320 (1975).

We find no merit in plaintiffs’ contention that the rezoning ordinance is invalid because they had no…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Blades v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Taylor v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  3. Teachey v. . GurleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  4. State v. JoynerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  5. Scott Poultry Company v. Bryan Oil CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Capps v. City of RaleighCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  2. Gullickson v. Stark County Board of County CommissionersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Pinehurst Area Realty, Inc. v. Village of PinehurstCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  4. Abernethy v. Town of Boone Board of AdjustmentCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  5. Chrismon v. Guilford CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API