Legal Opinion
Duckworth v. Sayad
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided March 27, 1984No. 46547PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KAROHL, Presiding Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant Sam Duckworth, a police officer of the City of St. Louis, requested a review under Chapter 536 RSMo 1978 of his discharge as punishment for violation of Rule 7, § 7.010(c) of the Police Manual. The rules were authorized by § 84.170.2 RSMo 1978 and published by respondent Board of Police Commissioners in furtherance of its duties as defined in § 84.090. Rule 7 describes Complaint and Disciplinary Procedures and § 7.010(c) provides inter alia:
7.010 Standards of Conduct—
Every member of the department shall, at all times, maintain reasonable standards…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jackson v. SayadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- Lile v. Hancock Place School DistrictMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- State v. DiazHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. DiazHawaii Supreme Court · 2002