State Ex Rel. Onslow County v. Mercer
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WYNN, Judge.
Under North Carolina law, to prevail in a plea in abatement, a defendant must show that the parties, subject matter, issues and relief sought are the same in both the present and prior actions. Clark v. Craven Regional Medical Authority, 326 N.C. 15, 21, 387 S.E.2d 168, 172 (1990). In the present actions, the State seeks to hold defendants liable for violating the public nuisances laws of Chapter 19 of the North Carolina General Statutes; however, in the three prior and still pending actions brought against defendants, the issue of liability is premised on an Onslow County adult…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hogan v. Cone Mills Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- Mary Shoup Larry R. Shoup, Sr. v. Bell & Howell CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
- Cameron v. CameronSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Eways v. Governor's IslandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
- McDowell v. Blythe Bros. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Shoaf v. ShoafCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. DouglasCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- LMSP, LLC v. Town of BooneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
- State of North Carolina Department of Health & Human Services v. Armstrong ex rel. GibbsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- Anderson v. CrouchCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.