Legal Opinion
Niles v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 15, 1901PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Demueber to complaint.
1Opinion of the CourtLeventritt, J.
I am constrained to sustain this demurrer. The pleading is certainly not deficient in equity, but, on authority, the action at law adopted by the plaintiff cannot be maintained. It is unnecessary to rehearse the facts; they have been sufficiently spread on the court records in the various proceedings heretofore instituted arising out of the same transactions for which this plaintiff seeks relief. Farmers’ Loan & Trust Co. v. New York & Northern R. Co., 150 N. Y. 410; De Neufville v. N. Y. & N. R. Co., 81 Fed. Repr. 10; Oelbermann v. New York & N. R. Co., 7 Misc. Rep. 352. This is not a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. New York & Northern Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Greaves v. . GougeNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Gardiner v. PollardThe Superior Court of New York City · 1863
- Greaves v. GougeNew York Supreme Court · 1875
- Oelbermann v. New York & Northern RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hunnewell v. New York Cent. & H. R. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1911
- Rosenbaum v. RiceNew York Supreme Court · 1901
- Coll y Cuchi v. ArzuagaDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1916
- Equitable Trust Co. v. Columbia National BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928