Legal Opinion
Oelbermann v. New York & Northern Railroad
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 15, 1894PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Demurrer to complaint on the ground that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.
1Opinion of the CourtIngraham, J.
The complaint in this action is quite voluminous and contains many allegations of the motives and the intention of the defendants, the New York Central Railroad Company and Drexel, Morgan & Co., stated to be reprehensible, but I am unable to see that any fact is alleged that would entitle the plaintiffs to any of the relief demanded.
The action is brought to restrain the defendant, the New York Central Railroad Company, from voting upon certain stock owned by it at the election of officers of the New York & Northern Railroad Company, and restraining the Farmers’ Loan & Trust Company, as…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Niles v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1901
- Colby v. Equitable Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1907
- Oelbermann v. New York & Northern Railway Co.New York Supreme Court · 1895
- In re Buffalo, New York & Erie RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1896