Hunnewell v. New York Cent. & H. R. R.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
In Equity. Bill by James M. Hunnewell against the New York Central & Hudson River Railroad Company and another. On motions for temporary injunction and for appointment of receivers.
1Opinion of the Court
NOYES, Circuit Judge.
[1] The first question to be determined in this matter is whether the defendant, the New York Central. & Hudson River Railroad Company, should be enjoined pendente lite from transferring to the New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Company the shares of stock held by it in the defendant, the Rutland Railroad Company. The determination of this question must depend primarily upon whether it is reasonably certain that the complainant will obtain a decree to effectuate which it is necessary that the ownership of the shares in question should continue in the New York Central…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. New York & Northern Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1896
- De Neufville v. New York & N. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1897
- Niles v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1901
3Cited by3 opinions
- Baillie v. Columbia Gold Mining Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1917
- Kardo Co. v. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1916
- Bogert v. Southern Pac. Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1914