Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Adams

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 22, 1975No. Appeal, No. 1431PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The six Judges who heard this appeal being equally divided the judgment of sentence is affirmed.

Opinion by

Price, J.,

in Support op Affirmance:

This appeal by Louis E. Adams follows his conviction of Receiving Stolen Goods. A post-trial motion in arrest of judgment was denied and appellant was sentenced to not less than one year and not more than three years in prison and to pay the costs of prosecution.

It is the contention of the appellant that the evidence is insufficient to support his conviction. Reviewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict winner, as…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JeffriesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  2. Commonwealth v. RoscioliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. John L. Bailey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
  4. Commonwealth v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  5. Commonwealth v. HendersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. HarrisonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. State v. PappasUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Commonwealth v. BakerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  4. Commonwealth v. GraeffSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Commonwealth v. BlashSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API