Legal Opinion

State v. Pappas

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 28, 1985No. 19970PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWE, Justice:

After a jury trial, defendant George Pap-pas was convicted of theft in that he “received, retained, or disposed” of property of another in violation of U.C.A., 1953, § 76-6-408(1). He appeals. The sole issue is whether the property a defendant receives must actually be stolen.

Because numerous informants had told law enforcement agencies in the Salt Lake area that George Pappas was a well-known fence for stolen goods, the West Valley City police targeted him in a “sting” operation. The property used by the police officers was not stolen property, but only borrowed from local…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  2. People v. RojasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. State v. LammUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. KimbroughNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
  5. People v. AdlerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ex Parte WallsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  2. State v. JonasCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
  3. State v. BujanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
  4. State v. RamonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1987
  5. State v. Felix RuizSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2018

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API