Legal Opinion

Sharon B. Pollard, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours, Inc., Defendant-Appellant/cross-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 22, 2005No. 03-6611, 03-6612PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MERRITT, Circuit Judge.

The parties in this wrongful discharge ease waived trial by jury; and the District Court, upon remand from this Court, found that the plaintiff, Sharon Pollard, should prevail on her claim against her employer, DuPont, for intentional infliction of emotional distress under Tennessee law. Originally, the District Court had granted summary judgment for DuPont on this claim. Upon remand, the Court awarded plaintiff a total of approximately $2.2 million in compensatory damages (for back pay, front pay and infliction of emotional distress) and $2.5 million in punitive…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. Hodges v. S.C. Toof & Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Pollard v. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  4. Doe Ex Rel. Doe v. Roman Catholic Diocese of NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Coakley v. DanielsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Turley v. ISG Lackawanna, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
  2. Bridgeport Music, Inc. v. Justin Combs PublishingCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  3. Edwards v. Toys" R" USDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2007
  4. Lompe v. Sunridge Partners, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
  5. Monette Saccameno v. U.S. Bank National AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API