Legal Opinion

Hoague-Sprague Corp. v. Bird & Son, Inc.

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided April 6, 1950No. Civ. A. No. 7067PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

McCARTHY, District Judge.

Hoague-Sprague Corporation, doing business at Lynn, Massachusetts, and Bird & Son, Inc., doing business at Walpole, Massachusetts, are competitors in the shoe box-blank industry. Both supply shoe manufacturers or .shoe box manufacturers with flat box-blanks which are then formed into a completed shoe box. This latter operation is usually effected by means of box-forming machines which either automatically or. semi-automatically bend, glue, form and fold the boxes, or perform certain of those functions.

Hoague-Sprague Corporation alleges that it' is the owner of Letters…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Mercoid Corp. v. Mid-Continent Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Morton Salt Co. v. G. S. Suppiger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Motion Picture Patents Co. v. Universal Film Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
  4. Carbice Corp. of America v. American Patents Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Hartford-Empire Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bowlds v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API