Legal Opinion

People in Interest of KP

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 29, 1973No. 25971PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Erickson

K.P., the petitioner in this case, was expelled from the Denver public school system as the result of assaults which he made on some of his fellow students. K.P. challenges both his initial suspension and subsequent expulsion on the grounds that C.R.S. 1963, 123-20-7(l)(d), a portion of the School Attendance Law of 1963, is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad. In addition, K.P. contends that even if the challenged statute is constitutional, he was denied an adequate due process hearing and, therefore, the expulsion which resulted from the hearing is unlawful.

For the reasons discussed…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Papachristou v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Lanzetta v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Winters v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Weissman v. Board of Ed. of Jefferson Cty. Sch. Dist.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1976
  2. People v. TaylorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  3. People v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  4. Johnson v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, ETC.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1976
  5. In the Interest of WallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API