Legal Opinion

In the Interest of Wall

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided August 27, 1980No. 64239PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALLBEE, Justice.

This appeal arises from a determination by the juvenile court that subsection 232.-2(5)(c)(l), The Code 1979, is unconstitutionally vague both on its face and as applied. The factual background of the case is as follows. In January of 1977, appellee Pamela Wall, then age fifteen, gave birth to a son, Tyrone, who resided with her for approximately one year. The man believed to be Tyrone’s natural father has been absent since the child’s birth. Sometime in January, 1978, the local office of the state Department of Social Services received a report that Tyrone was not receiving…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Alsager v. District Court of Polk Cty., IowaDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1975
  3. Charles Leroy Alsager, Sr. v. District Court of Polk County, IowaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  4. Roe v. ConnDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1976
  5. Matter of TrappSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. In the Interest of DameronSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  2. Greenawalt v. Zoning Bd. of Adj. of DavenportSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  3. In the Interest of LongSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  4. In the Interest of ChadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  5. In the Interest of D.J.R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1990

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API