Legal Opinion

Pokriefka v. Mackurat

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 22, 1892PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Gartner, J.) Case. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, J.

This is a civil action for assault and battery.. The injuries complained of were serious. Defendant had a verdict, and plaintiff appeals.

The judgment must be reversed, because—

1. The evidence as to defendant’s good' character was improperly received. Fahey v. Crotty, 63 Mich. 383.

2. Plaintiff and defendant were neighbors, each .having a son about 19 years of age. Plaintiff claimed that her son had b.een assaulted in front of her own house by defendant and his son; that defendant had thrown a brick, which struck plaintiff’s son on the head, inflicting a severe scalp wound; that plaintiff ran…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Fahey v. CrottyMichigan Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kingston v. Fort Wayne & Elmwood Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Rennie v. Skellett Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  3. Fors v. ForsMichigan Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API