Legal Opinion

In Re Hannett

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided September 16, 2005No. Record 050985PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HASSELL, Chief Justice.

In this proceeding, which invokes this Court's original jurisdiction, the primary issue that we consider is whether a circuit court has the authority, pursuant to Code § 19.2-156, to appoint an attorney-at-law to serve as acting attorney for the Commonwealth because of the prolonged absence of the duly elected Commonwealth's Attorney.

I

Gordon E. Hannett is the duly elected Commonwealth's Attorney for the County of Floyd. His term of office will expire on December 31, 2007. Hannett is also a member of the United States Army Reserves. In February 2005, Hannett informed the…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Richardson v. YoungTennessee Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Watkins v. HallSupreme Court of Virginia · 1934
  3. Halifax Corp. v. First Union National BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 2001
  4. Virginia National Bank v. HarrisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1979
  5. Dodson v. Potomac MacK Sales & Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1991

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McBurney v. CuccinelliCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
  2. Dowling v. RowanSupreme Court of Virginia · 2005
  3. Compton v. Town of PulaskiPulaski County Circuit Court · 2014
  4. Lucas v. Medical Facilities of America, Inc.Roanoke County Circuit Court · 2007
  5. McBurney v. CuccinelliCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API