Legal Opinion
Mazza v. Kozel
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided July 18, 1984No. C 82-1820PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
LAMBROS, District Judge.
This is an action in which plaintiff alleges that defendants have violated various provisions of federal securities laws as well as the proscriptions of the Ohio Securities Act. Presently before the Court is plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment. In this motion, plaintiff seeks relief pursuant to Count Five of his complaint, which alleges violations of the securities laws of the State of Ohio. Also pending is defendants’ motion to dismiss Count Nine of plaintiff’s amended complaint.
I. FACTS
In 1979, defendants Paul L. Kozel and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- State Ex Rel. Commissioner of Securities v. Hawaii Market Center, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1971
- State v. GeorgeOhio Court of Appeals · 1975
- Martin v. SteubnerDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1979
- Emery v. So-Soft of Ohio, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Riedel v. Acutote of ColoradoDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1991
- Roger v. Lehman Bros. Kuhn Loeb, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1985
- J & S ENTERPRISES v. WarshawskyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1989
- Sherman v. River Oaks Office Plaza, Ltd.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993