Legal Opinion

Emery v. So-Soft of Ohio, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 4, 1964No. 26876PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWasserman, J.

The plaintiffs-appellants, Emil R. Emery and Janet L. Emery, hereinafter referred to as plaintiffs, filed their petition in the Rocky River Municipal Court against the defendant-appellee, So-Soft of Ohio, Inc. (formerly Zeo-Ran of Ohio, Inc.), hereinafter referred to as So-Soft and defendantappellee, Security Federal Savings and Loan Association, here*360inafter referred to as Security Federal. Tbe petition alleges that So-Soft is a corporation doing business in the State of Obio, and is engaged in tbe sale, distribution, and installation of water conditioning equipment, that Security Federal is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. People v. SydeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Groby v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,007 Willie Bell, Jr. v. Health-Mor, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  2. State Ex Rel. Commissioner of Securities v. Hawaii Market Center, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1971
  3. State v. GeorgeOhio Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Procter & Gamble Co. v. Bankers Trust Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1996
  5. Bruner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1970

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API