Legal Opinion

Roger v. Lehman Bros. Kuhn Loeb, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided August 21, 1985No. Civ. C-1-83-2012PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

CARL B. RUBIN, Chief Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (doc. no. 48) and Defendant’s Cross Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (doc. no. 54) regarding Count III of the Amended Complaint (doc. no. 40).

These motions require a decision whether under Ohio’s Blue Sky Law, O.R.C. § 1707 et seq. (1985), certain securities were exempt from registration requirements and, if so, whether Plaintiff must tender back these securities to Defendant in order to entitle Plaintiff to the right of recission.

I. FACTS

The background facts in this matter…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. James G. McHenry and Donald G. McHenry v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959
  2. State v. FrostOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Bruce Bagwell v. Canal Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
  4. Bronaugh v. R. & E. Dredging Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Martin v. SteubnerDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Stuckey v. ONLINE RESOURCES CORP.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2011
  2. McGraw v. Liberty Airlines, Inc. (In Re Bell & Beckwith)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1988
  3. Blue Sky L. Rep. P 72,964 James E. Mark v. Fsc Securities CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  4. Riedel v. Acutote of ColoradoDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1991
  5. Gounaris v. AppleOhio Court of Appeals · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API