Legal Opinion

The Kalencom Corp. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided May 18, 2020No. 15-00011Published

1Opinion of the Court

Slip Op. 20-68 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE THE KALENCOM CORPORATION, Plaintiff, Before: Timothy M. Reif, Judge v. Court No. 15-00011 UNITED STATES, Defendant. OPINION [Denying plaintiff’s Rule 56 motion for summary judgment and granting defendant’s Rule 56 cross-motion for summary judgment.] Dated: May 18, 2020 Peter J. Fitch, Fitch, King, LLC of Monmouth Beach, N.J., argued for plaintiff. Monica P. Triana, Trial Attorney, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, U.S. Department of Justice of New York, N.Y. and Alexandra Khrebtukova, U.S. Customs and Border Protection,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Dairyland Power Cooperative v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
  3. Mita Copystar America v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
  4. Sports Graphics, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
  5. Cummins Incorporated (Formerly Known as Cummins Engine Company) v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API