People v. Ruch
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gabriel
{1 This case requires us to determine whether the trial court properly revoked respondent Carl Daniel Ruch's probation for, among other things, refusing to enroll or participate in sex offender treatment based on his concern that in the course of such treatment, he would have been compelled to incriminate himself in violation of the Fifth Amendment.
~ T2 As a condition of probation, the trial court ordered Ruch to complete a sex offender polygraph and participate in sex offense specific treatment intervention. Ruch, however, refused to enroll or participate in such treatment, contending that…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Lefkowitz v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Lefkowitz v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Salinas v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- in Interest of K.S-EColorado Court of Appeals · 2021