Legal Opinion

Rodriguez v. Reading Housing Authority

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided November 9, 1993No. 93-1188PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

ALITO, Circuit Judge:

Carmen Rivera appeals from a district court order granting summary judgment in favor of the Reading Housing Authority (“RHA”) and its executive director on her claims that the RHA’s policy regarding public housing applications by minors violated various provisions of federal law. On appeal, Rivera contends that the RHA policy contravenes certain regulations of the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”). We hold that the RHA policy does not violate those regulations as currently interpreted by HUD, and we therefore affirm the order…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. United States v. LarionoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. National Center for Immigrants' Rights, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Rivera v. Reading Housing AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. (PC) Villery v. JonesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
  2. Ambert v. StaffordDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2024
  3. Arizona Attorneys for Criminal Justice v. DuceyDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2020
  4. Dakota J. Romero v. Deputy HodgeDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2024
  5. Price v. BreitenbachDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2025

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API