Legal Opinion

Dan Farr Productions v. United States District Court for the Southern District of California

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 26, 2017No. 17-72682PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This petition for a writ of mandamus arises in the context of a hotly contested trademark action initiated by San Diego Comic Convention (“SDCC”) against the producers of the Salt Lake Comic,Con— Dan Farr Productions, Daniel Farr, and Bryan Brandenburg (“Petitioners”)—over the use of the mark “comic-con” or “comic con.” The case has drawn nationwide attention and discussion on traditional and social media alike, in part because “comic cons” have been held in hundreds of venues across the United States. Because defendants actively participated in the public discussions over the…

3Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Sheppard v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Nebraska Press Assn. v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Skilling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Organization for a Better Austin v. KeefeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by8 opinions

  1. Elec. Frontier Found. v. Global Equity Mgmt. (SA) Pty Ltd.District Court, N.D. California · 2017
  2. Harvest Rock Church, Inc. v. Gavin NewsomCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  3. Underwood v. BNSF Ry. Co.District Court, D. Montana · 2018
  4. Baby Doe v. Joshua MastCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2026
  5. Doe v. Uber Technologies, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2022

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API