Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Doe v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 11, 2022No. 3:19-cv-03310Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JANE DOE, Case No. 19-cv-03310-JSC 8 Plaintiff, ORDER RE: MOTION FOR 9 v. PROTECTION 10 UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 169 Defendants. 11 12 13 Jane Doe brings a negligence claim against Uber and its wholly owned subsidiaries Rasier, 14 LLC and Rasier CA, LLC (collectively “Uber”) arising from an assault by a former Uber driver 15 posing as a current Uber driver. Uber’s motion for an order of protection is now pending before 16 the Court. (Dkt. No. 169.) Uber seeks an order prohibiting Plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nebraska Press Assn. v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Gentile v. State Bar of Nev.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Joel Levine v. United States District Court for the Central District of California, United States of America, Real Party in InterestCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  4. Dan Farr Productions v. United States District Court for the Southern District of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API