Brugier v. Miller
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Appeal from Twenty-Sixth Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Tammany; Thomas Moore Burns, Judge. Action by Oscar R. Brugier against Benjamin M. Miller and Charles L. Hosmer, receiver of the Slidell Company, Limited, intervener. Judgment for plaintiff, and the intervener appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
Statement.
MONROE, J.
Plaintiff obtained executory process upon an act of mortgage (in the usual form, save as hereinafter noted) of date February 7, 1903, securing a promissory note for $13,000, upon which, as he alleges, $1,462.50 has been paid. The property mortgaged lies adjacent to and in the town of Slidell, and is described in the act agreeably to the government subdivisions, but now and then, following the descriptions of particular tracts, there appears something to this effect, to wit, “It is understood and agreed that a street shall be laid out and dedicated on the last…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Calhoun v. Mechanics' & Traders' BankSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1878
- Chambliss v. AtchisonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1847
- Zuntz v. CornenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1855
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hernandez v. HarsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1959
- Cloud v. CloudLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
- Layman v. Succession of WoulfeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1915
- Mari v. MariSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1918
- Tilly v. WoodhamLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.