Layman v. Succession of Woulfe
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Appeal from Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans; Porter Parker, Judge. Proceedings by L. M. Layman against the Succession of M. P. Woulfe, wherein Harry A. Thompson intervened. From a judgment dismissing the injunction procured and a judgment dismissing a suspensive appeal, intervener appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtLand, J.
Plaintiff sued out executory process on two notes executed by Maurice J. Woulfe and secured by vendor’s privilege and special mortgage as shown by act of sale purporting to have been passed before a notary public and two witnesses.
One Harry A. Thompson filed an intervention in said executory proceedings, coupled with an injunction against the sale of the property, based on allegations substantially as follows:
That intervener was the holder and owner of two certain promissory notes identical in date, amount, and tenor with the two notes sued on by the plaintiff, and identified by the paraph of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chambliss v. AtchisonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1847
- Brugier v. MillerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1905
- Succession of LynchSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1909
- State ex rel. Bienvenu v. WrotnowskiSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1865
- Bank of Louisiana v. DelerySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1847
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- City of Natchitoches v. StateLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1969
- Ramizest v. RamizestSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1955
- Valley Securities Co. v. De RousselLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
- Albert Pick & Co. v. StringerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
- General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. JordanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1953
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.