Legal Opinion

People v. Blackwell

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 19, 1927No. Docket No. 947PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.

The defendant Blackwell and one E. N. Weed were jointly charged with the offense of unlawfully selling intoxicating liquor. Blackwell was tried separately and convicted. He has appealed from the judgment and the order denying a new trial.

The defendant was the proprietor of a drugstore at the time of the alleged offense and Weed was one of the employees in the same store. He became one of the principal witnesses for the prosecution under a promise made by the district attorney to dismiss the case against him if he “would testify against Mr. Blackwell.” Weed testified that Mr. and Mrs. Pierce,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. ConboyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  2. People v. KindlebergerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. People v. HoffmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  4. People v. BennettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  5. People v. DillwoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. CarterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. People v. PantagesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. People v. CrowleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. People v. SoulesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. People v. BaumgartnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API