Legal Opinion
Ferranti Electric, Inc. v. Harwood
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 25, 1964PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
William B. Brennan, Jr., J.
In this action, plaintiff Ferranti Electric, Inc., a New York corporation (hereinafter referred to as “Ferranti”), which is a wholly-owned sub*534sidiary of Ferranti, Ltd., a British concern, seeks a permanent injunction against the defendants restraining them from engaging in the manufacture and sale of magnetostrictive delay lines, from communicating plaintiff’s trade secrets in respect thereof to others, and from any endeavor to sell said devices to plaintiff’s customers.
Ferranti, since the year 1957, has been engaged in the development, production and eventual sale…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- E. I. Du Pont De Nemours Powder Co. v. MaslandSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Sarkes Tarzian, Inc. v. Audio Devices, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1958
- B. F. Goodrich Co. v. WohlgemuthOhio Court of Appeals · 1963
- Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. Technical Tape Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1959
- Sealectro Corp. v. Tefco Electronics, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1961
3Cited by18 opinions
- Standard Brands, Inc. v. ZumpeDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1967
- Ecolab Inc. v. PaoloDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1991
- Consolidated Brands, Inc. v. MondiDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1986
- Dynamics Research Corp. v. Analytic Sciences Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
- Mixing Equipment Co., Inc. v. Philadelphia Gear, Inc., and George Leamy. Appeal of George LeamyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.