Legal Opinion
Carbon Activated Tianjin Co., Ltd. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided July 21, 2023No. Consol. 22-00017PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Slip Op. 23- UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE CARBON ACTIVATED TIANJIN CO., LTD. AND CARBON ACTIVATED CORPORATION, Plaintiffs, and CALGON CARBON CORPORATION, NORIT AMERICAS, INC., AND DATONG JUQIANG ACTIVATED CARBON CO., LTD., ET AL., Consolidated Plaintiffs, Before: Mark A. Barnett, Chief Judge Consol. Court No. 22-00017 v. UNITED STATES, Defendant, and CALGON CARBON CORPORATION, NORIT AMERICAS, INC., CARBON ACTIVATED TIANJIN CO., LTD., CARBON ACTIVATED CORPORATION, AND DATONG JUQIANG ACTIVATED CARBON CO., LTD., ET AL., Defendant-Intervenors. Consol. Court No. 22-00017 Page 2…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Qvd Food Co., Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Qingdao Sea-Line Trading Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Timken U.S. Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Jiaxing Brother Fastener Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jilin Bright Future Chem. Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2023
- Neimenggu Fufeng Biotechnologies Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2024
- Neimenggu Fufeng Biotechnologies Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2024