Legal Opinion

Hill v. Houpt

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 24, 1928No. Appeal, 88PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion bv

Mr. Justice Simpson,

John Hill died leaving four pieces of real estate and certain personal property. His heirs and next of kin were five children, and two grandchildren, descendants of a deceased daughter. By his will he gave part of the personalty and two of the lots of ground to a daughter and the two grandchildren, — hereinafter called the devisees, — and directed that the rest of his estate should be sold, and the proceeds distributed among the de visees and his other children per stirpes. Before the will was probated, all the parties interested entered into a family agreement,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Cohens v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1821
  2. Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. Diamond Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  3. Rineer v. CollinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  4. Mott v. KaldesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  5. Mellon v. DavisonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Hayes v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. Pew TrustSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Garner v. Archers Glen Partners, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  4. Commonwealth Ex Rel. v. SnyderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  5. Collins v. SimmsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API