Harp v. ARCO Alaska, Inc.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOORE, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Linda Harp appeals a ruling by the Alaska Workers’ Compensation Board that ARCO Alaska, Inc. and ALPAC/CIG-NA/INA (collectively “the employer”) need not pay Harp a penalty pursuant to AS 23.30.155 for controverting her claim to temporary total disability (“TTD”) benefits. Harp argues that a penalty is appropriate because the employer controverted her claim in bad faith. The employer cross-appeals the Board’s ruling that Harp is entitled to TTD benefits. The employer argues that Harp is not disabled, and that even if she is disabled, her disability is not…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Miller v. ITT Arctic ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
- Kerley v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Stafford v. Westchester Fire Insurance Co. of New York, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Burgess Construction Co. v. SmallwoodAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Ketchikan Gateway Borough v. SalingAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Hughes v. Foster Wheeler Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1997
- Childs v. Copper Valley Electric Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
- Dougan v. Aurora Electric Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Thoeni v. Consumer Electronic ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Williams v. AboodAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.