Legal Opinion

Harp v. ARCO Alaska, Inc.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1992No. S-4400, S-4437PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOORE, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Linda Harp appeals a ruling by the Alaska Workers’ Compensation Board that ARCO Alaska, Inc. and ALPAC/CIG-NA/INA (collectively “the employer”) need not pay Harp a penalty pursuant to AS 23.30.155 for controverting her claim to temporary total disability (“TTD”) benefits. Harp argues that a penalty is appropriate because the employer controverted her claim in bad faith. The employer cross-appeals the Board’s ruling that Harp is entitled to TTD benefits. The employer argues that Harp is not disabled, and that even if she is disabled, her disability is not…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Miller v. ITT Arctic ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Kerley v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Stafford v. Westchester Fire Insurance Co. of New York, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Burgess Construction Co. v. SmallwoodAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Ketchikan Gateway Borough v. SalingAlaska Supreme Court · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hughes v. Foster Wheeler Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Childs v. Copper Valley Electric Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Dougan v. Aurora Electric Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Thoeni v. Consumer Electronic ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Williams v. AboodAlaska Supreme Court · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API