Legal Opinion

The Scow" 6-S."

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 2, 1919No. 301PublishedCited by 14 opinions

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. The case is stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pitney

This was a libel in rem, brought against a scow under the Act of June 29, 1888, c. 496, 25 Stat. 209, as amended August 18, 1894, (c. 299, § 3, 28 Stat. 360), and May 28, 1908, (c. 212, § 8, 35 Stat. 426), for illegal dumping in New York Harbor. Appellant, as claimant of the scow, denied the jurisdiction of the court to entertain the suit: first, on the ground that by the statute the vessel was made liable only for such penalties as might be imposed in criminal proceedings upon the persons responsible for the illegal act, and there had been in this case no conviction of such persons or…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. The StrathairlySupreme Court of the United States · 1888

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. 416 Cases G. T. WhiskyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
  2. Darby v. Philadelphia Transp. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1947
  3. United States v. the Republic No. 2District Court, S.D. Texas · 1946
  4. Aktieselskabet Dampskib Gansfjord v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1929
  5. Ford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1919

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API