Legal Opinion
Serpentix Conveyor Corp. v. Roth
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided December 6, 1989No. Civ. A. 88-B-26PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BABCOCK, District Judge.
This matter is before me on defendants’ motion for entry of final judgment. The liability trial was held in January 1989. On February 24, 1989, I entered a permanent injunction upon the jury’s special verdicts. The injunction embodies the law of the case that there is not infringement unless a Hydrogenetics slide model conveyor makes both vertical and horizontal turns. See September 1, 1989 Order. 718 F.Supp. 859.
Defendants argue that because plaintiff, Serpentix Conveyor Corporation (Serpentix), cannot identify any infringing convey…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- General Motors Corp. v. Devex Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Panduit Corp. v. Stahlin Bros. Fibre Works, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
- King Instrument Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Otari Corporation, Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- H.M. Stickle, G. Martinez, I.M. Garcia, J.M. Davis, and B.M. Goodstein, and Double Jj Corporation-La Hacienda Mexican Food MacHinery v. Heublein, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Serpentix Conveyor Corporation v. Francis A. Roth, Florence W. Roth, and Hydroginetics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990