Legal Opinion

Rivers v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 31, 1911No. 3020PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Accusation for carrying concealed weapon; from city court of Dublin — Judge Hawkins. October 10, 1910.

1Opinion of the CourtPowell, J.

In a criminal case, where the accused has exercised his statutory right to make a statement and the statement is contradictory of the testimony of the State’s witness, it is the duty of the trial judge, even in the absence of written request, to instruct the jury that they have the right to believe' the' statement in preference to the sworn testimony. Burns v. State, 89 Ga. 528 (15 S. E. 748); Doster v. State, 93 Ga. 43 (4), (18 S. E. 997); Fields v. State, 2 Ga. App. 41 (4), 46 (58 S. E. 327). Judgment reversed.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Burns v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
  2. Fields v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  3. Doster v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bullard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
  2. Roberts v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  3. Bryant v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
  4. Knopp v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
  5. Godfrey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API