Legal Opinion

Bryant v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 7, 1918No. 9724PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Indictment for seduction; from Gordon superior court—Judge Tarver. April 10, 1918.

1Opinion of the CourtHarwell, J.

This was a trial for seduction, and the only witness (except a witness for the State, an officer, in reference to the arrest of the defendant) was the prosecutrix. The defendant introduced no witnesses, but made a short statement, denying that he had promised to marry the prosecutrix. In the motion for a new trial it is complained that the court omitted to instruct the jury on the law touching, the defendant’s statement at the trial. This case is very much like that of Fields v. State, 2 Ga. App. 41, 47 (58 S. E. 327), where this court said: “'In this particular case the omission [to charge…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Burns v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
  2. Fields v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  3. Doster v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  4. Berry v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  5. Rivers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Knopp v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API