Legal Opinion

Godfrey v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 22, 1942No. 29229Published

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.

1. In a criminal case, where the accused made a statement to the jury, and the court in charging the jury on the statement omitted to instruct them that they had the right to believe the statement in preference to the sworn testimony in the ease, such omission requires the grant of a new trial, where it is apparent that the omission was prejudicial to the defendant; and this is true although no timely written request for such a charge was made. Burns v. State, 89 Ga. 528 (4) (15 S. E. 748); Doster v. State, 93 Ga. 43 (4) (18 S. E. 997); Fields v. State, 2 Ga. App. 41 (4), 46 (58 S. E. 327);…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Burns v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
  2. Fields v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
  3. Doster v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  4. Wheeless v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  5. Rivers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API