Legal Opinion
Bronson v. Herbert
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided May 31, 1893PublishedCited by 7 opinions
Error to Wayne. (Gartner, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, C. J.
The plaintiffs are nurserymen of Geneva, N. Y. In 1883 they made the following agreement in writing with one W. W. Essig:
“ The following agreement, made and entered into this 23d day of March, 1883, between Bronson & Hopkins, of *480Geneva, N. Y., of the first part, ■ and William, W. Essig, formerly of Elmore, Ohio, now of Detroit, Michigan, of the second part, witnesseth:
“B. & H. agree to furnish the said Essig, foi>the fall packing -of 1883, such nursery stock as the said Essig may require, at the following prices; it being mutually understood by both parties that such varieties of trees and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Blackwood v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Weiden v. WoodruffMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Petersen v. Door, Sash & Lumber Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1883
3Cited by7 opinions
- Cohen v. JackoboiceMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- White Showers, Inc. v. FischerMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
- Parkinson v. ParkinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
- Mayo v. KollerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
- Bialy v. KrauseMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.