Legal Opinion

University of Kansas v. Sinks

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided July 28, 2009No. Case 06-2341-JARPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JULIE A. ROBINSON, District Judge.

The Court now considers the parties’ motions for judgment as a matter of law. Plaintiffs moved for judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 50(a) at the close of all evidence and also renewed their summary judgment motions. Plaintiffs also filed written motions: Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law on the Secondary Meaning of the Crimson-and-Blue Color Scheme and the Inherent Distinctiveness of Plaintiffs’ Word Marks (Doc. 323); and Plaintiffs’ Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law on Defendant Orth’s Mere Printer Defense (Doc. 325).…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Weeks v. AngeloneSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. Samara Brothers, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Qualitex Co. v. Jacobson Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Forney Industries, Inc. v. Daco of Missouri, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
  2. Ireland v. DodsonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2010
  3. Lingo v. LingoDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2011
  4. House of Bryant Publications, LLC v. City of Lake CityDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2014
  5. Lott v. Oklahoma City City ofDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API