Legal Opinion
Lingo v. Lingo
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided May 19, 2011No. Civ. 10-624-SLRPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SUE L. ROBINSON, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Archibald Lingo (“Archie”) and Archie’s Market, Inc. (collectively “plaintiffs”) filed this action against Dinah Lingo (“Dinah”), Jessica Lingo (“Jessica”), Lingo Bros. LLC, and The Original Lingo’s Market (collectively “defendants”) on July 2, 2010. (D.I. 1) In their amended complaint, plaintiffs allege that defendants improperly use their “Lingo’s Market” trademark 1 in violation of § 32 of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1114, and Delaware state trademark law, 6 Del. C. § 3312-14 (2009). Plaintiffs also allege that said use of the mark…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Kos Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Andrx Corporation Andrx Laboratories, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Opticians Ass'n of America v. Independent Opticians of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- A&h Sportswear, Inc Mainstream Swimsuits, Inc. v. Victoria's Secret Stores, Inc. Victoria's Secret Catalogue, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Interpace Corporation v. Lapp, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Fisons Horticulture, Inc., in No. 93-7224 v. Vigoro Industries, Inc., in No. 93-7287Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- HomeVestors of America, Inc. v. Warner Bros. Discovery, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2023
- New Balance Athletics, Inc. v. USA New Bunren International Co. Limited LLCDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2019